Canada’s PASPA moment?

Canada has long been a favorable country for the industry, but has been limited to betting on specific actions, so the rise of legal markets has been limited. However, Call Rush reports that the state government has become a reality of supporting the bills that stipulate the personal rate.

Article 207 (4) (b) of the Canadian Penal Code was a lon g-term drought condition for the hope of a Canadian sports gambler.

Section 207 (4) (B) prohibits betting a single event in Canada, urging Panant to claim pearly provided by local lottery businesses. Reading other sentences shows that Canada is an unusual body of sports betting. While wel l-known images are being done every day, different things are completely banned.

However, thanks to the efforts of officials who are interested in Canada and the world's sports betting, the C-13 bill, which received legislative support, may change the scenery of Sports Betting Canada.

The bill is simple. He says:

"This bill is a lottery scheme that brings a configuration in Article 207 (B) of the Penal Code, legally, the government of the state, the government, or a cognitive or legal entity, and a consistent rate. Regulatory to carry out directly or in the countr y-no horse coun t-for fighting or for one sport event or competition.

The bill C-13 still has to overcome a certain number of barriers, but Canadian sports fare and gambling experts are confident in the future. And, like legislative dominoes, a person involved in these interests came to the future.

Progress imminent?

In many relationships, the C-13 bill also provides turning points to the Canadian sports industry, and in fact, some have compared the US Highest Court's conclusion on the cancellation of PASPA in 2018. Of course, the comparison is fair, but the path to a single event legal fee in Canada is actually the most difficult to bend than that of the neighboring country in the south.

Paul Burns (Canada Gaming Communications)

"" For example, there are many stepovers. "This bill is the biggest piece. This bill is passed, and we trust the whim of the court and the arbitrators. No need. "

"In real time, this bill is at the second reading of the House of Representatives. This bill is subsequently applied to the committee. The committee has a hearing for several days, and then the bill was deliberated in the third reading. Discussion is leaked, and the bill is sent to the Senate of Canada.

Canada has not yet reached PASPA, but it seems to be near here.

"The legal foundation in Canada is a long process," Robu Judiche talks about the leader of the Legal Affairs Division of Ellis Game Technology in the United States. However, at the end of the success, taking into account the liberal eyes of Canada, it is not considered to be absolutely likely, like cannabis, which has led to a functional rise in the market so long ago. The branches are not allowed. "

"Furthermore, the trend is, as we expect, the number of needs to continue housing and other tax information providers is the number of reasons that lead to the adoption of the law."

For this reason, Canada has all reasons that gamblers on hungry gamblers are gambling to one event. And, according to Barnes, expectations can be shor t-term.

"After the bill has been enacted, it will definitely remain a little," he explains. "The state government must be a normative foundation that almost all people are already working on, but basically, after the law is passed, sports tariffs begin to be quite good. I think it will be.

"In fact, in the jurisdiction of rural areas, nothing is needed on the legislation. Some businesses will move quite nicely. If everything goes perfectly, some platforms will already be distributed. Yes.

The possibility of speed in Canada is wealth not used by the state operator. In the United States, the state law stipulates the formation of sports betting, but in Canada's bill, only one event is left for customization and license acquisition before sportsbooks can start business. I have the ability to legalize the betting.

Stateside learnings

The comparison with the South American market here is probably a vegetable orb. In Canada, the ban on single event betting was released at the federal level, and adjustments were made at the state level.

In the United States, each state needs to legalize sports betting fees and start adjustment and approval.

This difference can mean that the journey to the market to the market is much shorter than the United States. And, due to the uniformity between the two major markets, Canadian companies can use the United States as a splash barometer in northern state.

Businesses are looking at Bazaar in Canada through the prism in the United States. John Levi CEO of Canadian Descore said the company has gained a "huge lesson" from the South American market. In fact, the consistency of the jurisdiction area has a very useful possibility for business operators.

John Levi, Tescore

"We are building an ecosystem in the descore." We are neither a mere bookmaker company nor a media company. This is the whole circle. In this ecosystem, the basic rules are for anyone. But it is important to be applied.

"As an example, the U. S. market is developing every state. In terms of one independent market," If another application is created for another state, and more states are legalized, further. You have to make many applications. " This is not necessarily possible due to the fast expansion speed in the US market.

Levi and Tescore have adapted their platforms to such fragmentary approaches. "I don't have separate applications for New Jersey, Colorado, and Indiana. This is the same application, the same wallet. This approach to our sports betting platform requires a lot of work. We use this performance in the Canadian market.

According to Ellis Game Technology Chairman of Michel Kiavarella, Chairman of the Director of Michel Kia Barella, "We have regulated gaming operations, so that a" state support state support "system in Canada will be operated in the United States. I'm thinking. "

The only advantage we think is a competitive difference that can make a border acquiring attractive to players.

Grey market shift

It is unfair to say that the gray sports betting market is prosperous in Canada, but this is true.

Canadian gamblers use offshore sportsbooks to bet on individual sports prohibited by criminal law. However, according to major individuals and companies in Canada, the appearance of single event betting provides new opportunities to these businesses.

"It is clear that some customers have already selected Canadian brands, and some of these brands may be offshore sites, but some of these brands. After obtaining permission, it may appear as a approved operator < Span> "We are building an ecosystem in the descore." We are not just a bookmaker company, the media. This is not a company that allows everyone to apply to this.

"As an example, the U. S. market is developing every state. In terms of one independent market," If another application is created for another state, and more states are legalized, further. You have to make many applications. " This is not necessarily possible due to the fast expansion speed in the US market.

Levi and Tescore adapt their platforms to such fragmented approaches. "I don't have separate applications for New Jersey, Colorado, and Indiana. This is the same application, the same wallet. This approach to our sports betting platform requires a lot of work. We use this performance in the Canadian market.

According to Ellis Game Technology Chairman of Michel Kiavarella, chairman of the Michel Kiavarella, said, "We have regulated gaming operations, so that a" state support state "system in Canada will be operated in the United States. I'm thinking. "

The Ontario effect

The only advantage we think is a competitive difference that can make a border acquiring attractive to players.

It is unfair to say that the gray sports betting market is prosperous in Canada, but this is true.

Canadian gamblers use offshore sportsbooks to bet on individual sports prohibited by criminal law. However, according to major individuals and companies in Canada, the appearance of single event betting provides new opportunities to these businesses.

"It is clear that some customers have already selected Canadian brands, and some of these brands may be offshore sites, but some of these brands. After obtaining permission, it may appear as a approved operator, "We are building an ecosystem in the descore." We are not just a bookmaker company. But this is the most important thing for everyone.

"As an example, the U. S. market is developing every state. In terms of one independent market," If another application is created for another state, and more states are legalized, further. You have to make many applications. " This is not necessarily possible due to the fast expansion speed in the US market.

Levi and Tescore have adapted their platforms to such fragmentary approaches. "I don't have separate applications for New Jersey, Colorado, and Indiana. This is the same application, the same wallet. This approach to our sports betting platform requires a lot of work. We use this performance in the Canadian market.

According to Ellis Game Technology Chairman of Michel Kiavarella, Chairman of the Director of Michel Kia Barella, "We have regulated gaming operations, so that a" state support state support "system in Canada will be operated in the United States. I'm thinking. "

Sports for the masses

The only advantage we think is a competitive difference that can make a border acquiring attractive to players.

It is unfair to say that the gray sports betting market is prosperous in Canada, but this is true.

Canadian gamblers use offshore sportsbooks to bet on individual sports prohibited by criminal law. However, according to major individuals and companies in Canada, the appearance of single event betting provides new opportunities to these businesses.

"It is clear that some customers have already selected Canadian brands, and some of these brands may be offshore sites, but some of these brands. After obtaining permission, it may appear as an approved operator.

John Levy of TheScore largely agrees. "I think the acceptance of grey market participants depends on whether they are socially acceptable. In fact, I think these companies with legitimate board recommendations and activities will be able to get a license in Canada. I think the movement here will be more about open and fair competition. Meanwhile, everyone plays by the same rules, so they will fight here the same way they do in the US."

In short, Canadian sports betting participants also agree that grey market operators are welcome in the regulatory system.

"If the Canadian government reforms the Criminal Code to allow single-game betting, I expect there will be an amazing offshore market that will demand regulation," says Matteo Monteverdi, CEO of Elys. "This has happened when gambling was fully regulated (Ontario's OLG, for example)."

Sports betting participants talk passionately about Canada, but much of the talk is about Ontario, which has already legislated to create a betting market for private operators. And this is true when considering the comparison with the US market.

"With a population of 15 million, Ontario is comparable to the fifth-largest state in the U. S. As the market develops, Ontario could approach the benchmarks of New Jersey and Pennsylvania," Lo Giudice said.

According to CGA President Burns, Ontario is already in the process of adjusting.