Innovate on Purpose

Jeffrey Philips's blog is timely for sustainable, recycling ideas, discussions, and layouts. The concepts introduced here are all my personal, and there is no need to sign a contract with the employer.

Tuesday, January 04, 2011

Why innovation makes executives uncomfortable

I have been working in an "innovative ball" as a consultant for more than seven years, so I have regularly trained "innovation", and as a result, I finally came to me. Confessing the inconvenience, why innovation is caused by many chapters of discomfort. If you take up a belief system every day, you actually believe (technological innovation is a good thing!), So you, therefore understand why it is, Understanding another point is very difficult. As a result, as a lon g-standing direction, I basically thought that innovation was a valuable opportunity and product like me.

As I have worked with managers and other people who have definitely helped me to understand me in the past few months, I have lost my confidence in this, so technical innovation is their failure. It causes pleasure. And in fact, my conclusion about why innovation causes discomfort is divided into each chapter, and I was confused.

For a long time, I have been suffering from this problem. As a result, I came to want to create an elegant and neat classification method for barriers that prevent innovation. For the time being, I prepared three categories and types, but as you can see in this notebook, I want you to write your personal opinion in the "statement" column without being shy. I want to admit that you are really thinking about this excuse. The perception of this is actually a certain number of bases, according to the technological innovation that causes the manager of the manager, and if you do not, you can answer you. We have a problem of technological innovation that hinders your commercial.

The first type is based on the belief that technological innovation requires an urgent or unused skill. At first glance, this has the potential to rise without challenging. In fact, innovation seems to be related to the unimaginable breakthrough in research work and the delicate observation of future buyers and needs. However, if you think about it, innovation is urgently needed to have a completely different ability from our organization. The usual WILDOTOMY is here:

Innovation is not a science of innovation that requires urgent art and requires urgently high quality knowledge. Innovation requires urgent skills and requires urgent risks. Not a precedent, not a belief

In other sentences, we already have all the skills we need for innovation. Innovation is a craftsmanship rather than a car.

But almost all of our chapters were originally brought up in the school of scientific management, which seeks to hammer out, outline and improve the impact and limitations of work on small details. How Brown worshippers have all the odds to prove, you can't doubt the position or speed of a particle, but something else. The same can be said about innovative skills - they are relevant, but not amenable to scientific management.

It's like a garden of children taught by quantum athletes. The children would not feel any joy if they were forced to follow fairly clear and strict instructions, and the Poes would not like the free play and thought creation by the boys.

The second typology is based on the fact that innovation is quite unpredictable. This fact becomes more and more undeniable the more the probability of failure increases. And again, we have a branch that has learned to believe, and the rewards reinforce this belief. In fact, a company is an organization that achieves systematic and constant results in the face of all the uncertainties surrounding environmental and financial turmoil. Innovation is not something that runs on our clocks or schedules, but ideas and necessities emerge as customer tastes and history change. Few chapters are interested in constructs that truly characterize disruptive ideas, and even if they have every chance, the number of changes these ideas have every chance of making, and the associated effects of these changes, that are important to grow the top or bottom line of profits. Most chapters simply exchange systematically measured increases within a certain range of numbers for tyrannical hikes based on arbitrary disruptive ideas.

In this case, we can make an analogy to baseball players. The majority of managers believe that players with an average effectiveness coefficient of . 300 hit single or double strikes, while players with a . 275 hit the target or knock the ball down.

The basic third type is the fact that innovation in the final result is established under someone's control. Almost all chapters of the highest link are lying on their own that they are obliged to win their company. We are guilty of longing for the people who have decorated the cover of Fortune and Forbes, and looking back and asking what they were thinking. For example, do you remember the chainsaw ELA? Only their insight, strategy, and leadership are trying to accomplish something. In the world of branches, which has a good reputation and changing daily, those who draw a vision and gather the best employees will succeed. Innovation is sometimes regarded as the first prize. Most organizations have 10 to hundreds of people who actively participate in innovation. The more innovation occurs in the organization, the weaker the control of the overall responsible person in the product, strategy, and formation direction. Like Apple, everyone does not clearly grasp the strategy, goal, or purpose, and innovation must be fully obeyed this vision. Most tissues in the center lack a similar clarity, so they are as follows.

1. You need different skills from supported or resolved skills.
2. Space} Leader prefers a normal forecast of a bohemian profit beat and profits
3. Space} {Space} In that case, the number of innovation that tends to control the team will increase.

1. Space} Innovation is funding
2. Space} Innovation requires strong funds

Furthermore, I did not use 1 of the right options: according to these criteria, the choice of usefulness and the right volume by lowering costs is for the technical innovation of the best case scenario to respond. If you lower the cost while you have any chance in the future, it will be a technological innovation to distinguish the almost immediate response.

The reason why this candidate was not included is that it is true, but it can be so in the long term. Companies that reduce costs by 5 % every year will be zero in at least 15 years. After all, fresh products, offers, and great deals are needed for any business. In fact, for example, this is a shor t-term cause of not introducing innovation.

This is my type. Please let us know your opinions. In fact, if I can get the arguments "we have a little time" or "we have a little money", we can innovate from other grounds. You can see that you will block. In order to introduce innovation, you need to make this one of the classic type 3 types to reduce anxiety.

26 Comments:

Exciting, Jeff (mostly, like "criminal innovation", laughs, but I recommend this series every day.

I want to think a little about your "three" prepositions.

1) The child's garden, which was built correctly, is actually taught quite a bit, but this is a different lesson. Studying on what to study (and how to study in a different way) is committed to seeking a lot of interest, but the teacher's hands are not limited. Configuration models are more important than any other model in the damaged childhood. However, it does not focus so much about what you know (knowledge of knowledge of knowledge). In parallel, organizations and their leaders actually need deeper learning, as employees think.

#Part 2) It is good to compare it to baseball, Jeff. Do you know the Saber Metrics Revolution of baseball? Almost all the most loved statistical features are misleading. Combination, RBI, ERA have bad results. However, the best statistics (war, VORP, victory share, etc.) can create a smart organization with other things by human resources and draw conclusions in this IRGE.

[In your example, this batter S. 275 hours is still a large number of walks, and its value to the team is much higher, such as Zwadderich Adamdanna, which has a low BA. I have a possibility, but rather an OPS].

Innovation may require a more impressive statistics. When the manager uses highly reliable, completely accepted statistics without predictive power. Because of the possibility of this, like us (readers), it is required that these people will develop statistics that are truly predictable!

3) It is quite difficult for managers including small and mediu m-sized enterprises to form a completely penetrating view. (We all know that it is very difficult to include opportunities to compare opportunities).

Shouldn't we teach ourselves? (Who is currently working on the data? I generally recommend reading a new notebook on Atlantic magazine about Tim Kane's [Growthology Blog] Hunter. And why the army loss Is the profit of the organization?

Thank you for the provocative article!

18:36 PM Dr. Norris Crewgar said.

Exciting, Jeff (mostly, like "criminal innovation", laughs, but I recommend this series every day.

I want to think a little about your "three" prepositions.

1) The child's garden, which was built correctly, is actually taught quite a bit, but this is a different lesson. Studying on what to study (and how to study in a different way) is committed to seeking a lot of interest, but the teacher's hands are not limited. Configuration models are more important than any other model in the damaged childhood. However, it does not focus so much about what you know (knowledge of knowledge of knowledge). In parallel, organizations and their leaders actually need deeper learning, as employees think.

#Part 2) It is good to compare it to baseball, Jeff. Do you know the Saber Metrics Revolution of baseball? Almost all the most loved statistical features are misleading. Combination, RBI, ERA have bad results. However, the best statistics (war, VORP, victory share, etc.) can create a smart organization with other things by human resources and draw conclusions in this IRGE.

[In your example, this batter S. 275 hours is still a large number of walks, and its value to the team is much higher, such as Zwadderich Adamdanna, which has a low BA. I have a possibility, but rather an OPS].

Innovation may require a more impressive statistics. When the manager uses highly reliable, completely accepted statistics without predictive power. Because of the possibility of this, like us (readers), it is required that these people will develop statistics that are truly predictable!

3) It is quite difficult for managers including small and mediu m-sized enterprises to form a completely penetrating view. (We all know that it is very difficult to include opportunities to compare opportunities).

Shouldn't we teach ourselves? (Who is currently working on the data? I generally recommend reading a new notebook on Atlantic magazine about Tim Kane's [Growthology Blog] Hunter. And why the army loss Is the profit of the organization?

Thank you for the provocative article!

It's a wonderful post. As a human being suppressed by corporate culture, I understand them well. I think the condition of "control" is actually considered an additional part of the type. Innovation requires freedom and managers are controlled. This is one of the basis, and therefore the innovation of what other companies come is differen t-they do not have the luxury for the manager who is controllin g-they are forced It is dangerous and has the freedom for technological innovation to achieve the splash.

Thank you for the wonderful comments. However, I would like to briefly advise to fix the unconditional "either one" pointed out about many features in this notebook.

Most innovations need a strong focus of "both" to introduce the innovation of tasks and contexts and safely use the results.

My experience is clearly from working in the architectural service industry. There, all design / documentation / implementation projects require "both" and provide value.

Of course, managers can suppress not only "innovation" but also all aspects of business. Mutual fertility with other fields leads to success.

For those who want to deepen their understanding of the creative process (still in any field) and the many roles that each of us should play, Roger Von Ochi's masterpiece "A Kick in the Head and a We recommend Kick in the Pants (available on www. creativethink. com).

Nobody thinks you are the only leader, manager, or employee.

Please continue to have an interesting and useful dialogue in the future!

I am also compared to NFL Quarterback and Company. I use a lot of sports because I work in communication.

As you notice, NFL's really good quarter back has a higher intercept rate than the average quarterback. Why? If you want to be outstanding in any business, you must take risks and innovate. It's a great article. thank you.

I think the answer is to have an agile way of thinking and approach.

It's a great post. The only possibility that it can be added is "vision" (not the current usage, but also a valuable concept such as "mentering" and "networking" again.

By default, looking at the future is just an extension. In fact, most leaders are trained to ignore other ways to see the future. As Clayton Kristensen pointed out, the victims of destructive technology may know their existence and may be studying, but they can be integrated into their own hard trend lines. do not have.

I don't know what to call this factor, but it's probably a "linear future theory."

This comment was deleted by the author.

It's an interesting post. thank you. In my experience, business leaders are experts who manage portfolio risk profiles, and thus buying or withdrawing new innovation means the risk profile of the industry, competition, corporate culture and attitude. It is determined by many factors, such as tolerance, financial profiles, other risks in portfolios, and, of course, your own risk profile and tolerance (including factors related to your career).

I think that the more complicated, the more difficult it will be. For example, "Innovators" actually have a lot of opportunities to do their job perfectly, but have not been able to control commercialization (this is the value of innovation). Is aware. And entrepreneurs always blame the reckless "creative" in the organization, but they are particular about what they actually have and are not particular about what they do.

Someone (anyone) has the opportunity to bridge from innovation to commercialization and put the innovative idea to the bazaar from the concept. A favorite bilingual of my family, speaking two languages. Designer sinker.

Thank you for awakening the set Dumas.

Great blogs In fact, accepting innovation is rich in insights, but it is often not considered as a result. In 2011, companies have started a new planning process, and for the majority, they do not connect more than the gradual improvement of existing model s-more, the minimum resources will be created. Request that. As you already, it will flow a few times before the company disappears or the market changes.

Forbes. com's website has a good memo that if you apply a script, innovation may be the least threatened and frozen. http: // t. co/7qhgkp3

Thank you Jeffrey.

It is a wonderful reading, almost all ideas reflect my ideas and skills. This is the first time I have found your blog via Glen @skirrid, but it will come again. Thank you for introducing the brown movement and the principle of baseball.~)

As a useful contribution, some things that I still have the ability to correspond to the equation (of course, if it exists).

1) Are organizational systems and protocols (commerce, education, government, etc.) focus on not raising bad people or people, not financial indicators? I can't help but believe that it is a rudimentary idea in a long opportunity, but I often have a balance sheet to think about data. I wonder how many chapters are.

2) Quote Einstein's words. "Not everything that actually exists can be considered, and not everything that can be considered."

3) "Kai noise and Spider: Inoperable forces of an untruffled tissue without leaders" -This is "SCREAMING" published in 2006. The book offers a number of examples that question the ability and design of hierarchies that promote innovation. I often think about how to change the expression of a message and direct responsibilities in a hierarchy framework. Also, in fact, not only the role and general creativity, but also the values ​​of talentedis m-amateur, moon, followers and experts, like me and people like me.

I also have to thank your comment center, which is very good to produce a comment from other people (always find a contribution to the network without being selfish). But I will take a note of my noteboo k-thanking my friend.

Thank you for everyone. Positive Duma, Carl

Jeff, your thoughts are clearly consistent of the fact that business discussions on issues have been forced to have innovation and why everything is in a brand new direction now.

I loved innovation for over 10 years, and I was interested in what was happening in the ranks of senior managers like you. In the company I used to work, innovation was not accepted by the top management until part of the intention of the reward. Until this stage, innovation was viewed, but the General Manager did not close the millions of dollars in the market.

When the relevance to the reward was lost, cost reduction and other optimization opportunities were given priority, and true innovation buds were picked. At least, the General Manager has not yet been satisfied, but has actually invested in technological innovation. Sorrow, the emperor has no clothes!

How can I believe this excuse and how can I complement your hypothesis? I believe that all of these innovations are not easy. Yes, this requires creativity. In addition, you need eager and highly conscious human resources who are more likely to be mistaken for correct things. Innovation is difficult for your boss to use your ILI metaphor because of the fact that 10 % is determined to be ready to subscribe to multiple splash coefficients. This does not require funds to actually freeze innovative, but it is patience that fits or breaks you.

Finally, the order for the devil fears the instructions of the white and black world of the advanced guru Sigma of the technological innovation. You are absolutely correct, actually the same, in the quarterly $ 0, $ 30 volumes, is not a true innovation, but motivation.

Great innovation is born from leaders who are not afraid of failure. They are asked the right questions and are ready to get through.

Thank you for this post.

I have been studying creativity and innovation in the workplace for several years, but I believe that one of the main causes of the lack of ideas lies in organizational culture. This culture is born from senior managers, so if the leader does not want to accept and support creative culture, or if no one wants to come up with an idea, this is the responsibility of the leader.

There is no need for a large amount of money or time to become a more innovative and creative organization. This is an excuse, saying, "I do not want to refuse control" or "I do not like change."

Some of these organizations will disappear, which is reasonable.

Successful innovation requires both software (art, quality) and hardware (fact, quantitative indicators). After success in a product, he begins to fill the belt conveyor with a function request for existing customers. Or, instead of one or two major successes, they begin to evaluate innovation with the existence of 5 to 10 mediocre products. Effective innovation requires the ability to cut off bad ideas and break through good ideas. It may not be easy if the leader becomes emotional to a bad idea or tries to get budget, personnel, and glory.

I recently think about this while communicating with the top of the organization that I want to use innovation as part of the brand, but I do not want to be involved in innovation as a work process.

I think your opinion will be helpful.

In addition, it was found that many leaders were confused with advanced experience and innovation, focusing on pursuit and implementation of Best Practis. One organization's best practices are not always inherited by another organization. Of course, best practices are not innovation. Innovation requires a creative approach that aims for perfection. Nevertheless, many of these leaders sell their organizations as innovative, and their views provide an advanced way with less risk.

It's a wonderful and very useful article. It's a pity that I didn't understand this 10 years ago. I love sports analogy. It's a wonderful technique that conveys your thoughts. Bravo!

Some comments:

The word innovation is often used by mistake. How? read more

B. Innovation is mainly defined as "positive changes with targets."

C. The ideas and concepts you are discussing are more applicable by the word "invention".

Why? Fear of management / ego and point.

Given this as an inventor or as an innovator (15 years or more), there is no objection that "leaders" or "managers" are afraid of either. In my experience, they often dismisses us with true innovative skills as soon as we create the next "big". That way, you can further blur our ego who stood out its benefits. Who knows more about this?

They do this from timid, or from cognitive dissonance, or lazy. This can explain the fact that they are scattered as if they were free by the word "innovation". I knew they were really afraid of me. Good. I hope they will be more afraid of me in the future.

In the past, everything was wrong. However, somewhere in the 1980s, someone realized that CEO could establish a company under his name and attack the company all day without fear of prosecution. So it was like now. A world dominated by many hype delusions with vulnerable ego.

I would like to find a general manager or excellent leader who really talks about the truth (whatever) to those who have to make a life plan according to the words of those who are responsible for the standard of all employees. Give almost anything. I want to hire such a person right away!

In reality, most of the new products are born from the marketing department and are brought to the R & D department. After that, the leaders of the company judge profitability. The leaders were "too late."

The chainsaw believed that he would buy body armor and guns and pay for bodyguards. This is a significant sign that you know you are playing games at the expense of someone. If the leader thinks that all of these needs for effective duties, you should do something else.

And to open the opportunity to all employees of the company. While the company receives millions of dollars, giving employees a 5 0-dollar gift card in Wa l-Mart is a tremendous insult. This is because "innovation" cannot be taught, enforced, or tracked or evaluated quantitatively. She must be invited. Otherwise, whatever you do, she will refuse to appear.

It's a very impressive note. In our company, as a true innovator, I am not suitable for my boss. But I have no choice. I have a lot to learn, and there are things I need to train for you.

It's a wonderful and very useful article. It's a pity that I didn't understand this 10 years ago. I love sports analogy. It's a wonderful technique that conveys your thoughts. Bravo!

Some comments:

The word innovation is often used by mistake. How? read more

B. Innovation is mainly defined as "positive changes with targets."

C. The ideas and concepts you are discussing are more applicable by the word "invention".

Why? Fear of management / ego and point.

Considering that he is an inventor and an innovator (15 years of useless year), we can't help but agree to the fact that there is a "leader" or "manager". In my experience, they often abandon us with true innovative abilities, once we do the right "big" small things and correct the terrible blunder.

They do so (as I recognized here), because of the fear of cognitive dissonance and laziness. This data is actually spread by the text "innovation" and is explained as if it was a gift. They were really afraid of me. wonderful. In the future, they will be more scared of me. Previously, I was basically thinking about what was inside me.

Previously, everything was wrong. However, in a place in the 1980s, someone believed that someone could actually kidnap the company for a whole day without asking for legal measures.

I would like to find a general manager or excellent leader who really talks about the truth (whatever) to those who have to make a life plan according to the words of those who are responsible for the standard of all employees. Give almost anything. I want to hire such a person right away!

The chainsaw believed that he would buy body armor and guns and pay for bodyguards. This is a significant sign that you know you are playing games at the expense of someone. If the leader thinks that all of these needs for effective duties, you should do something else.

It's a very impressive note. In our company, as a true innovator, I am not suitable for my boss. But I have no choice. I have a lot to learn, and there are things I need to train for you.

What has actually changed in the past few decades so that the United States ambiguous championships in innovation development? Randy Male has resolved the main comments (like the Matt Snider's comments on retail certificates for hiring corporate innovators).

What affects the reward project? Leadership. And what do leadership actually trade? After all, a trader. What have you been seeking more strongly than traders in the mi d-1900s? The best shor t-term gain (and escape to the right and excellent abilities to gain shor t-term gains). According to my evaluation, the overall logic of investment companies has evolved from the important parts of lon g-term investment at all levels (from investors to individuals). In this way, a business environment and civilization of the leadership are formed, focusing on the conclusions of one day or more, and optimizes profits for the first and quarters.

I spent most of my career in a solid company. In the wasted 20 years of working there, the company tried to transform from a regulated regulatory company to a competitive company. The reorganization / shrinkage of the country was a matter of course, and the key was cost reduction. Among them, I found a team of a small company that develops a unique business. At a virtual entrepreneur shop, dozens of teams operated all the main features, personal networks, personal claiming systems, individual sales units, and other major features.

What has actually changed in the past few decades so that the United States ambiguous championships in innovation development? Randy Male has resolved the main comments (like the Matt Snider's comments on retail certificates for hiring corporate innovators).~What affects the reward project? Leadership. And what do leadership actually trade? After all, a trader. What have you been seeking more strongly than traders in the mi d-1900s? The best shor t-term gain (and escape to the right and excellent abilities to gain shor t-term gains). According to my evaluation, the overall logic of investment companies has evolved from the important parts of lon g-term investment at all levels (from investors to individuals). In this way, a business environment and civilization of the leadership are formed, focusing on the conclusions of one day or more, and optimizes profits for the first and quarters.

I spent most of my career in a solid company. In the wasted 20 years of working there, the company tried to transform from a regulated regulatory company to a competitive company. The reorganization / shrinkage of the country was a matter of course, and the key was cost reduction. Among them, I found a team of a small company that develops a unique business. At a virtual entrepreneur shop, dozens of teams operated all the main features, personal networks, personal claiming systems, individual sales units, and other major features.

What has actually changed in the past few decades so that the United States ambiguous championships in innovation development? Randy Male has resolved the main comments (like the Matt Snider's comments on retail certificates for hiring corporate innovators).

What affects the reward project? Leadership. And what do leadership actually trade? After all, a trader. What have you been seeking more strongly than traders in the mi d-1900s? The best shor t-term gain (and escape to the right and excellent abilities to gain shor t-term gains). According to my evaluation, the overall logic of investment companies has evolved from the important parts of lon g-term investment at all levels (from investors to individuals). In this way, a business environment and civilization of the leadership are formed, focusing on the conclusions of one day or more, and optimizes profits for the first and quarters.

I spent most of my career in a solid company. In the wasted 20 years of working there, the company tried to transform from a regulated regulatory company to a competitive company. The reorganization / shrinkage of the country was a matter of course, and the key was cost reduction. Among them, I found a team of a small company that develops a unique business. At a virtual entrepreneur shop, dozens of teams operated all the main features, personal networks, personal claiming systems, individual sales units, and other major features.

this

I played for innovative initiatives that apply the assets and major responsibilities that appeared in the event of a crisis, and with the support of additional investment in no n-interviews, the products and business departments were in industry trade. I was able to use the rapid growth boom in the industry. The fiv e-year project predicts $ 75 billion. The $ 75 billion, a network separation instructions could not guarantee the help of conclusions focusing on billing. After that, in the past 10 years, the best innovative initiative was approved by the General Manager (because all the distribution squads did not allow free bank tickets in the year of the balance sheet). There was an attempt to reborn the original incubator organization sent to the shop. My plan was one of the two (of the 20). Unbelievable things happened: A corporate image company was acquired. Earlier this week, EBAY announced that the realization of Mobile Commerce has exceeded $ 2 billion. In retrospect, my company's guidance can be said to have followed the spirit of the branch.

The additional moment of a sophisticated trader regarding busines s-based US culture changes are globalization for the past few decades. As a result, the American ring is a company in a country that is likely to receive financial support from its own sponsorship, the deviation from tariff advocacy, the technology that enables access to inexpensive human resources in developing countries. The challenge of competition is combined. Does the trader have enough stickiness so that South American companies can adapt their ecosystem and apply excellent quality in a new masububble field? In such an investment environment, how do most South American companies have made a financial promise for a on e-year speculative opportunity?

In my opinion, everything depends on the culture of a company, instructions, and ultimately a trader that affects the way innovators receive rewards. That kind of humanity. < SPAN> I played for innovative initiatives that apply the assets of the products and the main responsibilities of the product in the event of a crisis, and with the support of additional investment in no n-interviews, the products and business departments I was able to use the rapid growth boom in industry trade. The fiv e-year project predicts $ 75 billion. The $ 75 billion, a network separation instructions could not guarantee the help of the conclusion focused on billing. After that, in the past 10 years, the best innovative initiative was approved by the General Manager (because all the distribution squads did not allow free bank tickets in the year of the balance sheet). There was an attempt to reborn the original incubator organization sent to the shop. My plan was one of the two (of the 20). Unbelievable things happened: A corporate image company was acquired. Earlier this week, EBAY announced that the realization of Mobile Commerce has exceeded $ 2 billion. In retrospect, my company's guidance can be said to have followed the spirit of the branch.

The additional moment of a sophisticated trader regarding busines s-based US culture changes are globalization for the past few decades. As a result, the American ring is a company in a country that is likely to receive financial support from its own sponsorship, the deviation from tariff advocacy, the technology that enables access to inexpensive human resources in developing countries. The challenge of competition is combined. Does the trader have enough stickiness so that South American companies can adapt their ecosystem and apply excellent quality in a new masububble field? In such an investment environment, how do most South American companies have made a financial promise for a on e-year speculative opportunity?

In my opinion, everything depends on the culture of a company, instructions, and ultimately a trader that affects the way innovators receive rewards. That kind of humanity. I played for innovative initiatives that apply the assets and major responsibilities that appeared in the event of a crisis, and with the support of additional investment in no n-interviews, the products and business departments were in industry trade. I was able to use the rapid growth boom in the industry. The fiv e-year project predicts $ 75 billion. The $ 75 billion, a network separation instructions could not guarantee the help of conclusions focusing on billing. After that, in the past 10 years, the best innovative initiative was approved by the General Manager (because all the distribution squads did not allow free bank tickets in the year of the balance sheet). There was an attempt to reborn the original incubator organization sent to the shop. My plan was one of the two (of the 20). Unbelievable things happened: A corporate image company was acquired. Earlier this week, EBAY announced that the realization of Mobile Commerce has exceeded $ 2 billion. In retrospect, my company's guidance can be said to have followed the spirit of the branch.

The additional moment of a sophisticated trader regarding busines s-based US culture changes are globalization for the past few decades. As a result, the American ring is a company in a country that is likely to receive financial support from its own sponsorship, the deviation from tariff advocacy, the technology that enables access to inexpensive human resources in developing countries. The challenge of competition is combined. Does the trader have enough stickiness so that South American companies can adapt their ecosystem and apply excellent quality in a new masububble field? In such an investment environment, how do most South American companies have made a financial promise for a on e-year speculative opportunity?

In my opinion, everything depends on the culture of a company, instructions, and ultimately a trader that affects the way innovators receive rewards. That kind of humanity.

Another opinion (for the previous post): Innovation paid executions generally play a leading role. Since I have met a long time ago, this is a gorilla glass company Koning, which was made almost 50 years ago, but thanks to the only far away in the old days, I literally believe it. It is not a renovated glass, which is the perfect drawback for mobile devices, thin TVs and almost all other other. Coning is an irregular existence that should be noted. Koning has been able to endure all the hardships in the past few decades thanks to his main business, and has successfully gained from innovative development, which had not been interested until recently.

I am sad, as innovation is seen as a specific magic process. This is not a mus t-have, including the aristocrats that will be your future technical innovation. It is scientific and scientific, and it is possible to arrange innovative processes to throw in such a profit (and this is the pressure of all leaders). Read this "Innovative Tournament" that uses innovative tuning (because they have all the opportunities to regulate Dr. Warton).

Also, it is impossible to believe those who confuse the Brown Movement and the uncertainty principle of Hiizenberg. And, as someone else has discovered, your baseball analogy is wrong.

You look like another nuclear consultant, claiming that you have a magical versatile drug that sets up a magnificent business. Like other malicious consultants, you repeat an inappropriate and frivolous analog, your head hangs, but you can't connect anywhere.

I think of something new and work for a solid company that applies hard alignment to innovation. All top managers are the directors, and as a result, we can find the meaning of this process. Ambition, religion, and confidence are never made by the topic of the discussion. It's all about management, not a bad manager. It's not a consultant's simple advice.

Readers, commentators. Thank you for your polite comments. First of all, in order to accept what he or she was right, I actually wanted to answer anonymously, as if I had a Brown exercise on the principle of Heisenberg and did not have a brown movement. 。 Second, I permit everyone who is craving to leave all kinds of comments that contribute to the development of discussions related to the problem, and as a result, I am different from the garbage I receive. I did not delete the previous sentence.

I want to highlight a few elements. First of all, the mantra OVO innovation is entirely focused on the demonstration of innovation and the development of alternative innovative disciplines and processes. Please don't blame me for something I don't support.

In fact, I'd like to think that we are not "spitting" unreasonable or self-promoting innovative hype in this blog, but thinking about the real difficulties we encounter with our clients. And yes, I am an innovation consultant, but at least, that doesn't mean that I actually offer client recommendations or offers that are unnecessary or irrelevant in my opinion. I will not come to your playground to unconditionally blame you for your negligence or insincerity.

Another opinion (for the previous post): Innovation paid executions generally play a leading role. Since I have met a long time ago, this is a gorilla glass company Koning, which was made almost 50 years ago, but thanks to the only far away in the old days, I literally believe it. It is not a renovated glass, which is the perfect drawback for mobile devices, thin TVs and almost all other other. Coning is an irregular existence that should be noted. Koning has been able to endure all the hardships in the past few decades thanks to his main business, and has successfully gained from innovative development, which had not been interested until recently.

I am sad, as innovation is seen as a specific magic process. This is not a mus t-have, including the aristocrats that will be your future technical innovation. It is scientific and scientific, and it is possible to arrange innovative processes to throw in such a profit (and this is the pressure of all leaders). Read this "Innovative Tournament" that uses innovative tuning (because they have all the opportunities to regulate Dr. Warton).

Also, it is impossible to believe those who confuse the Brown Movement and the uncertainty principle of Hiizenberg. And, as someone else has discovered, your baseball analogy is wrong.

You look like another nuclear consultant, claiming that you have a magical versatile drug that sets up a magnificent business. Like other malicious consultants, you repeat an inappropriate and frivolous analog, your head hangs, but you can't connect anywhere.

I think of something new and work for a solid company that applies hard alignment to innovation. All top managers are the directors, and as a result, we can find the meaning of this process. Ambition, religion, and confidence are never made by the topic of the discussion. It's all about management, not a bad manager. It's not a consultant's simple advice.

Readers, commentators. Thank you for your polite comments. First of all, in order to accept what he or she was right, I actually wanted to answer anonymously, as if I had a Brown exercise on the principle of Heisenberg and did not have a brown movement. 。 Second, I permit everyone who is craving to leave all kinds of comments that contribute to the development of discussions related to the problem, and as a result, I am different from the garbage I receive. I did not delete the previous sentence.

I want to highlight a few elements. First of all, the mantra OVO innovation is entirely focused on the demonstration of innovation and the development of alternative innovative disciplines and processes. Please don't blame me for something I don't support.

In fact, I'd like to think that we are not "spitting" unreasonable or self-promoting innovative hype in this blog, but thinking about the real difficulties we encounter with our clients. And yes, I am an innovation consultant, but at least, that doesn't mean that I actually offer client recommendations or offers that are unnecessary or irrelevant in my opinion. I will not come to your playground to unconditionally blame you for your negligence or insincerity.

After all, we seek clients to be more innovative, and fail when they cannot provide innovation. This is because in my experience, many of the people who support innovation are not innovators, but are observed, so they recognize the "borrowing" innovation and provide their simula Kurlas to their customers. But it doesn't work as if you recommended a small and narrow and nice shoes for two people.

Don't ask Apple, Google, or Ford for ideas. These ideas have already been adopted and outdated, and will be assigned by competitors and other companies. Instead, follow the consumer. Read the news. He is interested in what he is not interested in, is interested in a community that he does not usually sympathize with, and communicates with strangers. In a nutshell, instead of worried about the natural conservatism of the "control" class, we are worried about our knowledge and the ability to persuade, but actually permeate.

First of all, thank you for your thoughts, but the idea that innovation is unconditionally blessed. However, it is clearly shifted to the idea that innovation is unconditionally blessed. Innovation is a too large category and depends on the situation that is trying to define it.

Innovation is recognized as a pos t-factor. For managers who have to manage each day, what happens at the end of the day is whether they succeed, not complete, or not.

The wise managers of the work I worked together are constantly exploring ways to sharpen my concentration and improve qualities. Those who have introduced new products and marketing strategies do so as needed. Apple is unique because there are always foresight people who are constantly evolving. In most companies, implementing innovation that Apple is good at is almost impossible because of logistics problems.