Services › Casino and Non-Casino Gaming › Internal Guidelines for Harm Prevention, Harm Minimisation and Responsible Gambling

This substantial instructions give a structure adjusted to a grou p-operated political person to comply with gambling laws, and in that framework, external initiatives and developments in the gambling field. The following adjustments are determined and implemented in relation to all the results for preventing gambling harm, damage, and serious problems formed as a result of new technologies.

Politicians' instructions are determined in advance for our internal use, but gambling suppliers and other stakeholders evaluate the characteristics we need to work, and the initiative in the gambling field. There are all opportunities to find what we need to recognize those judgments we pay attention to when we do.

• paper
• resume
• the goal
• Used field
• Purpose of gambling law (2003)
• Problem gambling
• Responsible gambling
• Specification of the problem
• Space} Range of regulation measures
• Major principle
  • Content
  • Related legislative regulations
  • principle
  • Space} The basis of guidelines regarding gambling
  • Politicians' activities: Coordination to manage uncertainty
  • Recruitment standard for conclusions
  • fasting

  paper

  Mike Hilgazette Rule Group Director Date: 21/09/2006

  Kate Raid Manager of The Group Operation Political Figure Exite of Gambling Date: 09/21/2006

  resume

  The main function of the operator is to propose support for implementing the regulation laws related to the 2003 terrace games. This instruction gives many tools to the operating politicians (hereinafter referred to as OP), and the support provides serious gambling, damages, and results on gambling and development of internal and external and external and external and external and external and external and outside the company. We have the ability to detect and decide appropriate measures to prevent.

  First, our tuning is performed in actual data. We start by applying the best confirmation (direct or indirect) obtained. Survey or other confirmation items are not accessible, diverse, or poor, and are in fact if you are concerned about being able to be affected by a reasonable, reasonable, or widespread harm. Apply a layout based on the scale of.

  • Regular referral legislation provisions and all kinds of related regulation laws
  • Space} A series of basic principles based on laws and appropriate normation acts, the principles of national policy planning and the practice of an administrative law.
  • Space} Regarding gambling gambling, a series of reasons for consistency, problem gambling games
  • O P-Approach that deals with uncertainty
  • A series of standards / problems to adopt the conclusions that are guided from the aforementioned may get used to the serious problems found inside and outside of the organization.

  The laws and all kinds of by services adopted accordingly have the power to give priority to the guidance principle. Apart from this, the instruction principle is a rudimentary tool that has at least no ability to limit our discretion.

  the goal

  • I n-house business initiatives: intensive formation
    • Politicians' activities
    • License standard
    • Game rules
    • Space} Notice by printed matter
    • Minimal stereotype
    • Stereotype for minimal operation. What is necessary for this is to ensure harm and/ or risks that are likely to be associated with gambling that covers the gambling of the problem are revealed in one ability and considered by a more preferable normative methodology. 。
    • Gambling Committee
    • Ministry of Health
    • Gambling contractor or adjacent branch
    • society

    Used field

    The instructions mainly refer to the job of the management politicians in the context of gambling compliance, mainly gambling compliance. These are things that touch when we evaluate our personal efforts and the results of our stakeholders to prevent and minimize harmful and serious problems with gambling.

    This instructions do not apply to aspects identified by some regulations for compliance with legal compliance, for example, complements or legal enforcement.

    Managers do not apply to legislation or law amendment discussions or development. However, there is a good chance that it will be applied in several qualities in consulting with a legislative policy and the Minister, and the instructions are the processes required by political analysts to be developed by legislative politicians. It is not designed to change. If the question is incorrectly (or may request) a normative response that exceeds the role of the operating politician group, a political image of gambling, horse racing, and censorship ("politics"). Transfer to the group.

    This document is regarded as a "living document," and has the potential to be our eyes and the occurrence of new research.

    Purpose of gambling law (2003)

    • Control gambling up
    • Prevent gambling harm and minimize.
    • Space} Promotes a serious attitude toward gambling.

    Problem gambling

    • Financial problem
    • Work problem (from poor work to fraud)
    • Difficulty in education and other human relationships
    • Domestic violence
    • Use alcohol abuse
    • Mental hygiene problem.

    Gambling addictions mostly affect both the gamblin g-addicted person and the other people involved in the lives of gambling.

    In the law, the definition of "harm" is very wide and includes personal, social and economic harm. Gambling can be damaged by others.

    • (A) In terms of all kinds of damage or pain, which is caused, caused, caused by gambling of human beings, all kinds of damage or pain.
    • (b) Includes personal, social and economic damage.
      • I. Face; or
      • II. Spouse, partner, family, trap, or wider community;
      • III. At work
      • IV. In society as a whole

      Responsible gambling

      • Conscientious attitude toward gambling
      • Environment where gambling is performed
      • Gambling without pressure or gimmicks
      • Overview} Spontaneous participation in gambling
      • (a) Being legal, honest, honest.
      • (B)
        • I. Being in a safe and reliable environment.
        • II. There is no pressure or means that intends to encourage gambling at a level that can cause harm.
        • III. Participants who understand the nature of activities and do not participate in a way that can be harmful.

        Specification of the problem

        The main function of the management policy is to support the provisions of the 2003 gambling law and related rules. This guidance faces a identified operation problem, when the Gambling Committee or the Ministry of Health requests comments and information from the DP, and when the industry, including the local community, requests or requests DP. In addition, it helps to concentrate DP thinking. In each of these fields, it may be necessary to respond to new and appearing technologies.

        • Industry website and surveillance organization
        • Industry magazines and publications
        • Research reviewed by the Policy Development Group
        • Regulatory forum
        • Conference with the industry forum
        • Joint expert advisory group on prevention of gambling damage and minimizing
        • Joint law execution information
        • Data received from the compliance department

        Note: The function of the OP or this leadership does not include the definition of the research program. The role of the team that formulates the policy is to find, integrate related research, and adjust the response that ASV has agreed. If you scan the source as described above, you may encounter new research. We do not comment outside of external research until the policy formulation team finds value in the research.

        Response to regulatory authorities

        Remarks of regulatory authorities and our response to initiatives are consistent with general slides, and will be complied with the following principles as needed.

        1. For example, specific and associated legislation provisions in the same law and relevant regulations, such as setting, fixing, or canceling the minimum standards or minimum sales standards for Type 4 license, the minimum standard or minimum sales standard.

        2. Related law

        3. Related principles of administrative law, processes, requirements

        4. The principle of advanced practice of appropriate regulations.

        Our response to regulations has the following phases: refusal to official behavior, postponement of decision-taking a survey, integrated approach, and persuasion (recommendation for implementation for gambling inspectors and sectors) (Including), surgical intervention (minimal survey criteria, game rules, class 4 licenses), technical intervention (minimal criteria and requirements of approved gambling equipment). In some cases, we may transfer questions to groups that develop policies to consider the development of legal acts, or provide government recommendations that legal and related regulations may need to point out. In some cases, the problem may be transferred to related groups for laws and regulations to ensure action to ensure compliance with the law. In each case, we will support the related groups with hints and information on the management policy.

        We consider the balance of resources in order to make a fai r-balanced decision in conjunction with the nature of the questions being considered.

        The following guidance principles can widely consider the harm to gambling, responsible attitudes, and sometimes the possibility of applied application.

        When applying these recommendations, it is important to remember:

        1. All ordinances adopted according to the law and according to it have the power to give priority to the guidance principle. < SPAN> Note: The function of OP or this leadership does not include the definition of the research program. The role of the team that formulates the policy is to find, integrate related research, and adjust the response that ASV has agreed. If you scan the source as described above, you may encounter new research. We do not comment outside of external research until the policy formulation team finds value in the research.

        Response to regulatory authorities

        Remarks of regulatory authorities and our response to initiatives are consistent with general slides, and will be complied with the following principles as needed.

        Major principle

        Content

        • 4. The principle of advanced practice of appropriate regulations.
        • Space} A series of basic principles based on laws and appropriate normation acts, the principles of national policy planning and the practice of an administrative law.
        • Space} Regarding gambling gambling, a series of reasons for consistency, problem gambling games
        • O P-Approach that deals with uncertainty
        • A series of standards / problems to adopt the conclusions that are guided from the aforementioned may get used to the serious problems found inside and outside of the organization.

        Related legislative regulations

        3. Related principles of administrative law, processes, requirements

        4. The principle of advanced practice of appropriate regulations.

        Our response to regulations has the following phases: refusal to official behavior, postponement of decision-taking a survey, integrated approach, and persuasion (recommendation for implementation for gambling inspectors and sectors) (Including), surgical intervention (minimal survey criteria, game rules, class 4 licenses), technical intervention (minimal criteria and requirements of approved gambling equipment). In some cases, we may transfer questions to groups that develop policies to consider the development of legal acts, or provide government recommendations that legal and related regulations may need to point out. In some cases, the problem may be transferred to related groups for laws and regulations to ensure action to ensure compliance with the law. In each case, we will support the related groups with hints and information on the management policy.	We consider the balance of resources in order to make a fai r-balanced decision in conjunction with the nature of the questions being considered.	The following guidance principles can widely consider the harm to gambling, responsible attitudes, and sometimes the possibility of applied application.	When applying these recommendations, it is important to remember:
        2. The teachings do not have the ability to limit our discretion in all cases, and conclusions are accepted every time in accordance with administrative laws.	Major principle	{space}	{space}

        space

        Space} A series of reasons for gambling games, which is the basis for our attitude toward gambling.

        {space}

        Space} O P-Approach that deals with uncertainty

        Space} {Space

        A series of standards / problems for adopting the conclusions derived from the aforementioned, for example, as a business, for example, you may get used to the serious problems discovered.

        principle

        Management politicians praise all questions received for discussions, in light of specific legal positions or regulations associated with the problem, mainly using all kinds of procedures prescribed by appropriate legislation. do.

        • Gambling cattle
        • Forced/ functional

        Attitude toward gambling harm

        {space}

        Class 1-4, gambling at casinos

        • Game rules (Article 367)
        • The right to set, set or postpone the standards for games or roles in specific games. In addition, systems, processes, information, documents related to specific games.
        • Ensuring the legality, faithful, and fairness of the games.
        • Provides a complaint review function. Regarding the above gambling C4, it was applied to urgently requested a record of the exclusion order.
        • In fact, the probability that such a thing will occur is minimal for those under the age of 18 who access the 4th gambling at the gambling field "(Article 67 (1) (b)), and the fourth type. The risk of gambling in gambling should not be doubtful (Article 67 (1) (P)).

        Space} The basis of guidelines regarding gambling

        The Secretary has the ability to define the minimum stereotype for design, manufacture, and implement a specific gambling device or gambling device, and has the ability to change or cancel the minimum stereotype at any time. (Article 327, paragraph 1).

        In addition to the provisions shown in the table, OP is often required to conduct business and practical discussions on other tasks and conclusions related to harm, minimizing harm, and serious gambling. 。 For example, the OP devised the main grounds on the various nuances of gambling in 2004 (preventing and minimizing harm) and consulting with the industry and internal agencies. These hints are mainly based on the correct position, and are all inexpensive and correct politicians and processes based on other correct segments, administrative legislation, and advanced experiments in gambling.

        principle

        In addition to the above warranty OP, as her opinion was so possible ...

        {space}

        Politicians' activities: Coordination to manage uncertainty

        {space}

        1. 2 Support for a serious attitude toward gambling.

        3. Relationship with the aspect of evaluation specified by the law or aspects specified in the rules adopted in accordance with the law.

        4. To ensure the Ministry of Health and Welfare's gambling eradication strategy

        • {space}
        • {space}
        • {space}
        • {space}
        • {space}

        6. 5 Motivated Director s-Measures have a focus on solving difficulties and achieving clear results.

        Evasion of approach to gambling

        1. The 2003 gambling method is related to gambling and problematic games, including its purpose, various minimization, the authority to minimize the harm, regulation, and gambling rules (harmful and minimizing). It is evidence that you chose a high level protection from the risk.

        2. The main dangerous factors related to gambling and gambling addiction are regular gambling, especially slot machines.

        3. 3. Of the regular gambling in New Zealand with slot machines, at least on e-fifth may be harmful as a result.

        4. Especially slot machines are continuous gambling that are very easy to use, and the harm has been clearly proven.

        5. Participation in recreational gambling, or harmless gambling, is a type of legal leisure for many New Zealanders if the 2003 gambling law requirements.

        Recruitment standard for conclusions

        • OP applies an approach to evaluate and develop liable gambling if the risk probability and value are clear and there is a reliable investigation or evidence. Use the best evidence (direct or indirect). However, there is no clear research or evidence on the risk level or specific intervention effectiveness.
        • As research on the effectiveness of measures to minimize harm progresses, OP is thought to be more and more expensive approaches.
        • There is a reasonable concern that technological innovation or intervention may expose gamblers and/ or other people to rationally,/ or widespread, all produced harm. For example, since the slot machine is listed as a more malicious gambling (that is, if it is related to other gambling, it causes more reasonable and widespread harm), so it is cautious. Layout based on a scal e-out of all fastest, focus on questions related to slot machines.
        • Research or other appropriate confirmation is not accessible, limited, uncertain, diverse or low.
        • Research coordination proposals are verified by sections and the general public according to the law to ensure transparency. If careful adjustments are possible, in addition to the formal consultation prescribed by the law, a dialogue with the affected parties will begin early.

        {space}

        The regulatory intervention / determination adopted by the space｝ OP is forecast, evaluated, and examined for reasonable and likely.

        {space}	DP regulatory intervention/ determination may be modified or postponed as a study aimed at preventing sincere attitude toward gambling, minimizing damage, and countermeasures.
        1. There is a wise basis for the preposition of damages in certain cases.	Reasons for concerns are clearly notified to the party involved. On this line, the applicant who has proven that the degree of damage (or damage may occur) is not considered to be serious, or that the damage may be appropriately alleviated even if the damage is increased. 。

        (3) There are a certain number of examples of the law, such as a legislature using a gambling examination, for example, segments 3, 37 (1), 52 (1), 67 (1), (2).

        4. Details of the conditional condition of the situation based on the confirmation and the details of the layout based on caution are detailed in the appendix A attached to the real document.

        Recruitment standard for conclusions

        {space}

        More advantageous "tools / tools" or rules that require OP to have a unique discussion

        {space}

        Evidence / study of the evaluated slide

        {space}

        Space} Level and range of damages

        {space}

        How long is the use of scientific evidence or polite alignment?

        {space}

        Production and testing of wide varieties.

        In relation to the appropriate criteria for adopting a conclusion, the use of scientifically healthy, or polite arrangement is shown in the matrix in the appendix B.

        Conclusion Recruitment criteria: Prevention of harm / minimization and sincere attitude toward gambling

        Category to accept conclusions

        Evidence / research

        {space}

        Joint

        {space}

        What are the evidence/ research that Deer evaluates about harm and/ or intervention?

        {space}

        Is it direct or indirect?

        If it is difficult to obtain direct evidence, is it possible to use simultaneous parallel and research?

        Is there a synergistic effect between the space data and other research results?

        Who and when do you have an influence? (In other words, regular players, recreational players, players' families and relatives, widespread associations, and all groups are harmful in the harmful format).

        How serious is the damage?

        What is the possibility of giving unjust results? Is there a possibility that the request of the law will be impaired?

        Does the harm have a discriminatory impact on all kinds of groups?

        Is there a reason to think that harm may appear or strengthen?

        Does the intervention / Initiatives propose a wider problem that we have not considered about the dangers and needs of politicians? Example: What kind of problems do vouchers propose in charity games in connection with gambling, incentives, and serious layouts for motivation?

        Is the intervention / Initiative helping other interventions? In the case of a statement, did you seek new technologies to reduce stereotypes and MOS, and further changes in other management means?

        Can the intervention / initiative have a differentiated effect on all types of groups?

        fasting

        Does this change the personality / betting of the game? Example: Does the unpleasant introduction of Shaffla affect all game tables on the uniformity of the game?

        Is there a unified game?

        Are the odds of winning displayed fairly and correctly? e. g. signage requirements

        Does gambling encourage prolonged, intense, repetitive behaviour? e. g. What are the potential impacts of serving food and drink on gaming machines?

        Does it support breaks during play? e. g. What are the likely impacts of restricting access to eftpos/alcohol/food whilst playing slot machines?

        Is it possible that excessive time or money is spent on gaming? e. g. Do promotions and programmes encourage prolonged play, excessive spending and high turnover?

        Does it support breaks in play? e. g. What financial policies encourage breaks in play?

        • Do the costs outweigh the benefits?
        • Responsibility: is it within our jurisdiction to address this issue? Should it be referred to the Gambling Commission?

        Is intervention/initiative/decision justified?

        • Consistency: Is the proposed intervention/initiative/solution consistent with existing measures? If not, is there a justification that meets the objectives of the Act?

        Does it support or unnecessarily duplicate other initiatives?

        Transparency: Is the intervention clearly defined?

        Can it be clearly communicated to those who need to be consulted?

        Have the reasons for the decision been clearly communicated?

        Have consultants been given sufficient information and time to respond?

        Target: Does the intervention/initiative/solution address the problem and have clear outcomes?

        What does the intervention want to achieve/solve?After the decision .

        

        Elim Poon - Journalist, Creative Writer

        Last modified: 27.08.2024

        We also have Internal Guidelines for Harm Prevention, Minimisation and Responsible Gambling information available. Form to use. Harm Minimisation Venue. Terms used in the search were: problem gambling, harm minimisation, harm reduction, responsible gambling, responsible gaming, electronic gambling machines . The Office of Liquor and Gaming Regulation, within the Department of Justice and Attorney-General, is responsible for minimising gambling harm.