NCAA Tournament Round-By-Round Betting Trends

Steve Makinen is in charge of the betting direction of "March Madness" in this year's NCAA tournament.

March 17, 2024

NCAA Tournament Round-By-Round Betting Trends

The NCAA tournament is a thre e-week event that has become a much better paradox than everyone imagined. The only event that seems to attract the interests of the sports world is the February super cup. Of course, this is not a simplicity of this recklessness, as it has the opportunity to change history, so it is not a simpler problem with the forecast.

The tournament is also a random game where they can participate in the pool, this autonomous, the most casual fans, you can choose a bracket or perform. In many cases, this is a schedule of the absolute fixed day since November, as it could change the book make r-process. As a result, it is the most important time in the year to own Gangycaping-Base.

I am proud that I basically share only the basic information in my essence. One of the sports events that I greatly depend on the latest data is the NCAA tournament. However, the team participating in the tournament may change every year, and the moment of acting on handicaps, such as motivation and accidental power, remains the same. This is one of the main reasons I stick to the development of trends and betting systems.

If you didn't care about last year's tournaments, the latest NCAA tournaments have created some reliable laws. I believe that you won't see a reckless tournament like last year. To sparse, the bracket was broken, and the panties, who were supporting the main winners except UCONN, were of course struggling with the depletion of the bankroll.

In addition, 27 out of the first 36 games were held with a minimum. In many cases, the readers of this document have been destroyed in accordance with some directions and systems that I shared and broke the round round. Among them, < Span> Steve Makinen, who is looking for excellent qualities by species, lines, and conferences, has a "March Madness" betting direction that requires noble in this year's NCAA tournament. I am in charge.

March 17, 2024

The NCAA tournament is a thre e-week event that has become a much better paradox than everyone imagined. The only event that seems to attract the interests of the sports world is the February super cup. Of course, this is not a simplicity of this recklessness, as it has the opportunity to change history, so it is not a simpler problem with the forecast.

The tournament is also a random game where they can participate in the pool, this autonomous, the most casual fans, you can choose a bracket or perform. In many cases, this is a schedule of the absolute fixed day since November, as it could change the book make r-process. As a result, it is the most important time in the year to own Gangycaping-Base.

I am proud that I basically share only the basic information in my essence. One of the sports events that I greatly depend on the latest data is the NCAA tournament. However, the team participating in the tournament may change every year, and the moment of acting on handicaps, such as motivation and accidental power, remains the same. This is one of the main reasons I stick to the development of trends and betting systems.

If you didn't care about last year's tournaments, the latest NCAA tournaments have created some reliable laws. I believe that you won't see a reckless tournament like last year. To sparse, the bracket was broken, and the panties, who were supporting the main winners except UCONN, were of course struggling with the depletion of the bankroll.

In addition, 27 out of the first 36 games were held with a minimum. In many cases, the readers of this document have been destroyed in accordance with some directions and systems that I shared and broke the round round. Among them, Steve Makinen, who is looking for excellent qualities by species, line spectrums, and meetings, is in charge of the betting direction of "March Madness" that requires nobles in this year's NCAA tournament. There is.

First Four Games

March 17, 2024

The NCAA tournament is a thre e-week event that has become a much better paradox than everyone imagined. The only event that seems to attract the interests of the sports world is the February super cup. Of course, this is not a simplicity of this recklessness, as it has the opportunity to change history, so it is not a simpler problem with the forecast.

The tournament is also a random game where they can participate in the pool, this autonomous, the most casual fans, you can choose a bracket or perform. In many cases, this is a schedule of the absolute fixed day since November, as it could change the book make r-process. As a result, it is the most important time in the year to own Gangycaping-Base.

I am proud that I basically share only the basic information in my essence. One of the sports events that I greatly depend on the latest data is the NCAA tournament. However, the team participating in the tournament may change every year, and the moment of acting on handicaps, such as motivation and accidental power, remains the same. This is one of the main reasons I stick to the development of trends and betting systems.

If you didn't care about last year's tournaments, the latest NCAA tournaments have created some reliable laws. I believe that you won't see a reckless tournament like last year. To sparse, the bracket was broken, and the panties, who were supporting the main winners except UCONN, were of course struggling with the depletion of the bankroll.

In addition, 27 out of the first 36 games were held with a minimum. In many cases, the readers of this document have been destroyed in accordance with some directions and systems that I shared and broke the round round. Among them, I am looking for excellent qualities by species, line spectrum, meeting, etc.

First Round Games

In fact, I warn me every year that trends and systems can change at any time. In particular, it can be developed based on Better's delusion or as a result of physical contradiction, and it may freeze the ground for successful betting. Considering the above, make sure that you observe yourself carefully and that there is enough "foundation" in that information to make a favorable bet.

Note that the data used to get these trends has been acquired from the 2001 or later tournament match on the host. But in most cases, I show the date or the number of games left. It is not a coincidence that 2001 was chosen. This is the first year that the tournament was expanded to 64 teams. Considering that the tournament will not be held in 2020 and the extraordinary tournament will be held in the same place (Indianapolis) in 2021, it is the third year that the tournament will return to the "normal" state.

If the results of 2023 were attractive to you, the book won 44 games out of 66 games, one of which had a spread in Picca. In these games, they achieved 33 to 32 to 1 ATS (50, 8 %). Depending on the drawing drama, the indicator 44-22 was literally the same as 2022, and the ATS indicators were three wins three wins.

Therefore, no matter how reckless the second half of the tournament was, there was no abnormality so far. Last but not least, in the 2nd round, three teams won more than last season, and only one Princeton team won.

Round navigation

As you can see in the analysis below, tournaments have the property of changing each round. A specific regular pattern has evolved relatively to extract the advantage from these changes.

-In the past 11 NCAA tournaments, the underwear is 24-19 ATS (55, 8 %) in the first round.

-There have been eight games with a coefficient of 5 points or more since 2001. In these games, boats played 7-1 SU and 6-2 ATS (75 %).

-The point indicators have proved at least 5 points of handicap and one bite of 26 22 su since 2001, but only 19-28-1 ATS (40, 40, 40, 40, 4%).

-The 1 since 2013, the favorite of 35-3 ATS handicap (92, 1%) in the fourth game has recently won Drake, but unusual, a handicap in 2021 with 1 and 5 points taps with 1 and 5 points. none.

-When, in all games, 1 4 met 16 numbers. Recently, in the game, the role of the seed team or less and the above 1 4 (68, 2 %) 15-7 have determined the coefficient of 15-7.

-The total is 14 wins and 7 losses (66, 7 %) in games with the highest one win and four losses or 139 games or more.

Joint trend

-The team who could not advance to the championship of the own conference in the 1st round has only 37 wins 58 losses (38, 9 %) in the conference, not a bad team. However, in the 2023 NCAA tournament, the group actually played 5 wins and 1 loss ATS, which is also considered a rare symptom.

-In the past 15 seasons, the secondary education institution from a powerful conference that lost SU and ATS in the championship match of your conference was 60-16 SU and 42-32-2 ATS (56, 8 %) in the first round. ) The tournament-skills that they had actually had, and they were not paying attention to the defeat in the conference championship.

-The coefficient is borrowed a baittors that indicates a stool in the first round, for example, as a small first-round worker fro m-1 t o-3, they are 54-59 SU and 43-66-4 ATS (39, 39, 5%) Since 2009. Last year, this desire changed in the opposite direction when the rewo did 6-2 SU and ATS.

The average value o f-3, 5 t o-7, and 5 Bucketrs still has a problem: In 2016, in the first round, their features are 38 to 22 SU and 27 to 33 ATS (45 %). ) Make).

-In the past 10 NCAA tournaments, firs t-round pigs with 13 and 5 coefficients have earned more points in the ATS season that came in 2022. During this time, they formed the results of 82 to 9 su, but from 39 to 50 to 1 ATS (43, 8 %). Last year, these teams played two wins and five defeats ATS, and Arizona and Perdy lost away.

-As that the final sum of the first round was 17 wins and 6 losses (73, 9 %) in the past four tournaments, and a total of 149 or more was a plus.

By seed

-Seed "No. 1 has a certain approval factor. As a winner of 19 t o-25 points, only 13-24ATS (35, 1 %) since 2009. 18, 5 or the smallest glasses winner, they have 8-1 ATS.

-In the six tournaments in the past, seed players below the first and lower have shown a good defense, as a whole of 12 wins and 4 losses (75 %), and has prevented rivals from scoring 60 or six points.

-Fill, for example, since 2005, it is free to name a huge total for the NO 2 teams with 13-23-1 ATS (36, 1 %) only with 17 or more winners. Since 2007, the 2nd team with at least 17 points of handicap is an impressive result of 20-8-2 ATS (71, 4 %).

-The last 23 games in the first round, where the third seed participated, has a wonderful result of SU22 wins and 1 loss and ATS14 wins and 9 losses (60, 9 %).

-The No. 3 team, who plays as a winner with a specific coefficient, has shown an impressive result of 20 wins and 7 losses (74, 1 %) in total since 2003, but their characteristics. Is low as 6, 9ppgs on average.

-In the past nine season tournaments, they fought 13-22-1 ATS (37, 1 %), of which 6-14-1 ATS (30 %) under 8 or 5 points or more. Contains numbers.

-Last year, the fifth seed cut the long-term execution of 18-31-3 ATS (36, 7 %) against the 12th seed and broke 4-0 SU and ATS. At least, these 5 numbers remain very vulnerable when they played as black for 6 hours, or recently, 18-8 SU (33, 3 % 3 %) ATS (33, 3 %). )

Second Round Games

-The secondary education institution for the powerful conference has been SU24-18, ATS13-27-2 (32, 5 %) as the fifth seed since 2008. In the 12th seed, 13 wins, 4 losses 1ATS (76, 5 %).

-In the last 56 games of the first round, the 6th (also 37 wins, 18 losses, 1 minute, 67, 3 %) No. 6 SU27 wins 29 losses, ATS21 wins 34 losses 1 (38, 2 %).

-When No. 6 plays an underdog or PIC in the 6th or 11th game, No. 6 has only 4 wins and 11 losses (26, 7 %) in SU and ATS since 2001. This is a decline in the traditional coefficient, and the last thing was done in 2022 when the No. 6 Colorado Stetteth lost to Michigan.

-7 breaks through the game PPG and creates a method in the range of 138.

-Adrophocuses that play under No. 7, not part of the strong conference, are considered to be 21-9-1 ATS (70 %) since 2004. In the No. 7 group in 2022, Malay State University (-2) beat San Francisco with a score of 5.

-Sed No. 7 played with a+3-3 spectrum, and since 2003, it has been proved that long odds are very useful: 38-21 SU and 35-23-1 ATS.

-Game 7 and NO 10 have recently become one of the rare heads in scoring: since 2015, they have been over 18-13 (58, 1 %).

In 2023, the teams below No. 8 lost 2 wins and 2 losses between SU ​​and ATS, and only 7 wins (35 %) for SU and ATS for five years.

The small winner (3 points or less) for th e-NO9 team is in the non-human stretch of 8-15 SU and 5-17-1 ATS (22, 7 %)!

-No. 8 vs. 9 in the past 25 games, 17 games have lost total (68 %).

-Sovokups In the past 21 years, the program from the non-powerful conference is 28-23 SU (40 %) with a seed between No. 4-6. They were much more successful in the spooded games in the lowest pressure no 7 and the NO 8-33-24-4 ATS (57, 9 %) games.

-The powerful conference team was not quite safe with the seed spectrum under No 11-14. Since 2008, they have won 27-19 SU and 28-17-1 ATS (62, 2 %).

Joint trend

- Bettors have not won a game in the second round of the NCAA Tournament since 2017. Since then, they are 21-37-1 ATS (36, 2%) when switching to the first rule. This change compared to the first round is due to the shorter preparation time for the second round.

- The top four second round winners who won in the first round but failed to cover the spread are 44-16 SU and 33-26-1 ATS (55, 9%) since 2013, and 34-23-3 (59, 6%) or worse overall.

Sweet 16 Round

- Double-digit second round matchups - 49-2 SU and 31-20 ATS (60, 8%) since 2001. 15 of the last 22 games involving championship favorites have had lower totals (68, 2%), with championship favorites passing by only 60, 8PG.

Trends by Seed

- For the last 25 years, there has been a clear milestone when the #1 favorites ATS stand on the line for 12 hours and fight for the win. In fact, "seed" No. 1 favored by 12 points or more have played 23-1 SU, but 9-15 ATS (37, 5%).

- Wall has a sperm No. 1 series of 4-12 ATS (25%) against No. 8 in the second round, but 9-7 ATS against No. 9 in the same decade.

- No. 2 teams in the second round feel the pressure of the obstacle, winning just 14-23 in their last 39 games, 2 ATS (37, 8%). Since 2002, favored opponents with a 5-point advantage or less are 13-19 SU and 10-20-2 ATS (33, 3%).

-The top three seeds have struggled recently in the second round: current ATS slips are: 1-12-18 ATS, 2-14-23-1 ATS, 3-9-17 ATS.

-In the second round, Staley recently coached 4-6 seedings that will have such a spread in 2020: 4- 18-11 ATS, 5- 20-9 ATS, 6- 20-10 ATS. In the first round, these teams seem to have survived in the second round.

-Since 2011, teams that finished 10th in the second round are 4-13 SU, but 10-5-2 ATS (66. 7%).

-Since 2001, in second round games between the best double-digit seeds, SU and ATS have played with a 12-2 favored record every time. Meanwhile, in games between seeds 5-7, double-digit seeds are 5-21 SU and 8-15-3 ATS (34. 8%) over the same period.

-Teams ranked 14th or lower that won in the first round have lost in the second round by an average of 14. 8 points (0%) since 1998.

Elite Eight Round

- Since 2001, top-ranked teams have given up an average of 14 points in the second round and are 10-16 (38, 5%) SU and ATS.

- In second round games between mid-level underdogs, the team that scores 7 or more points is 6-5 SU and 9-2 (81, 8%) ATS.

-In recent years, it is risky to earn big points in the NCAA tournament "Sweet 16": Since 2017, a good card with 5 points or more is 13 wins and 9 losses, but in ATS. There are only 7 wins and 15 losses (31, 8 %).

The winning rate of "sweet 16", which has a handicap o f-8 points or more, is 26-8-3 under (76, 5 %) and a total of 63, 0 ppg.

-Svit-16 "is determined by the first and second seeds. The match results in the past nine seasons are SU35 wins and 12 losses, ATS28 wins 18 losses 1 minute (60, 9 %). However, a year ago, both SU and ATS were one win and three losses.

-The "Sweet 16" is generally the goal of a team with tw o-digit glasses. However, they have high competitiveness as underdogs: Since 2011, this role has been 15 wins, 7 losses 1ATS (68, 2 %).

-The popular game No. 4 has recently been performed under the No. 1 board: SU12 wins and 2 losses in the past nine tournaments, ATS 9 wins 4 losses and 1 minute (69, 2 %).

-In Sweet 16, "I shouldn't have been there" or the teams that should be less than the fifth seed or less, and since 2001, both the lower teams were 11 wins and 7 losses (61, 1, 1). %).

Final Four Round

-The top teams who play as a lower or peak N-IM in the Sweet 16 match are 6 wins and 2 losses (75 %).

-In the latest game "Svit 16", the latter is SU7 wins and 5 losses, 4 losses (63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, 63, ATS 7 wins, 5 losses, ATS7 wins 5 losses. It was shown the result of %).

-The total of "SVIT 16" games, including at least one program from unfortunate conferences, have been less than 24-14 (63, 2 %).

-There in the past 23 years, a total of 128 or less "SVIT 16" matches have been held 23 times, with a total of 16 wins and 6 losses (72, 7 %).

-NCAA tournament elite 8 rounds have long been a dangerous spot for the team that has been in the top, with only 47 wins and 45 losses in SU since 2000 and 33 wins 55 losses (37, 5 %) in ATS. 。

-The winning candidate for the "Elite Eight" with a handicap of 4 points or less in the past 12 games was only 2 wins and 10 losses in SU in 1998, 1 win 10 losses (9, 1 %) in ATS, 15 at ATS. Win 33 losses and 1 minute (31, 3 %).

-The elit e-eight match is important, and since 2006, the winner has left 61 wins and 5 losses and 2ATS (92, 4 %).

Sinc e-2003, 14 wins and 12 losses in SU, 15 wins, 10 losses, 1 minute (60 %) in ATS, and 9 wins and 2 losses and 1 minute in underdogs with three or more handicaps.

-The elite eight rounds are clearly "survival rounds" for the first seed control tower, and since 2001, they have been SU32 wins and 25 losses in the round, ATS23 wins 30 losses and 4 % (43, 4 %).

-The elite Wazmer 1st to 3r d-ranked teams have serious problems in competing with teams with fourth place or less. The match performance after 2001 was 17 wins and 14 losses, 8 wins 21 losses and 2 minutes (27, 6%).

Championship Round

-The elit e-eight round has been the best round since 2001 with a total of 87 wins 63 losses and 2 minutes (58 %) or more. In the small (143 or less) games, there are 59 ves and 29 subs, which is 67 %.

-The elite eight's "I shouldn't have been there" or the third or worst teams, the teams that took the lower ranks after 2013, 7 wins and 3 losses in SU, 8 wins and 2 in ATS. Defeat (80 %).

Th e-NCAA tournament's "Final 4" has achieved 35 wins, 7 losses and 2ATS since 2001, but recently San Diego State has won Florida Atlantic without coating. I am.

-In the "Four Four", the team ranked first in the first place, if you haven't played against other teams, 17 wins and 5 losses for SU and 12 wins and 9 losses (57, 57, ATS (57, 57). 1 %).

The winning candidate for the last four games with a handicap o f-5 points or more has shown a confident growth of SU19 wins and 3 losses in the past 24 years, ATS13 wins 8 losses (61, 9%).

-In the last seven games of the best four, which the teams in the first or second place did not participate, the teams seeded with 6 wins and 1 loss (85, 7%) won.

-The No n-Strate Conference team has entered the final 4 and played against the team of the powerful conference in the past seven games with SU4 wins and 3 losses and 42, 9 % (42, 9 %).

Sinc e-2001, the ACC team has achieved the biggest success in the final 4: SU11 wins and 6 losses, ATS 10 wins and 7 losses (58, 8 %).

• -The five out of the six games in the semifinals have passed in total, extending the series of the past nine tournaments to 12 wins and 5 losses (70, 6 %).
• -Eight out of nine games in the past four tournaments whose first total has been reduced within one week before the start of the match, 8 games have ended in total (88, 9 %).
• -The winning team could not cover the spread in the past 23 years (Duke vs. Butler in 2010, Kansas vs. North Carolina in 2022).
• -In the past 23 years, in the championship, the team under No 3 will be terribly seeded without believing the unimaginable game NO 4 in the early 2014 NO 8 and the opposite NO 9 of last year. There are only 2-9 of SU and 4-7 ATS (36, 4 %).
• -The last eight teams, which reached the championship title from the average major conference, have only 2 wins and 6 losses (25 %) between SU ​​and ATS. In these games, which did not count one game, all were all low (85, 7 %).
• -In the past 16 games of the championship, Better summarizes the results of 6 wins and 10 losses (37, 5%) when the opening part shifts to any team. Last year he won the UCONN and moved the line wit h-6, 5 wit h-7. 5. This group includes 13-7 (65 %) victory when the total is changed to one side.