Nevada’s lack of casino self-exclusion law par for state, say experts

Ray, a known advocate of gambling, said he was prepared to lose his marriage last year when he told the owner of the Wynn Las Vegas casino that he'd had enough after spending 20 years tirelessly on the resort's slot machines.

"I thanked him for taking care of me and went back to California," Ray said. A week later, the owner called and offered him a free match of 25% of what he'd lost on his last trip -- a much bigger amount than the standard 3% he'd received before, according to Ray.

"It was free money. I couldn't say no. I had to make up for my losses," he said, adding that he promised his wife that he'd stop gaming once he'd exhausted the free loan.

But like many before him, Ray lost about $10, 000 in free games, plus another $75, 000 on top of that.

September -- Gambling Problem Awareness Month. National hotline to help gambling addicts -- 1-800-gambler.

Experts say the script is legal in Nevada and is repeated regularly. Nevada is a state that can boast the greatest experience in maintaining its casinos and sports balls while taking minimal measures to protect them.

Unlike most of the 40-plus states where gambling remains legal in some form (including riverboats and casinos), Nevada has no laws that deny people access to state-run casinos.

Instead, Nevada has a tooth-wracking self-limiting resolution that allows people to stay away from direct marketing offers and bonuses and loans from individual casinos, but not from gambling.

It's no surprise to gamblers that the state with the longest history of legal activity is lagging far behind in modern regulations.

Nevada sticks to a traditional approach. "Leave your money here and take your troubles home," is the phrase used by Kit White, executive director of the National Gambling Council. He said other states that have experienced the effects of Nevada's policies "decided to do a little better when they brought casinos into their jurisdiction."

Responsible gambling initiatives vary from state to state, but usually include some or all of the same components:

• Credit
• Overview
• Overview
• "It's a very personal thing," says Alan Feldman, a leading expert on responsible gambling at the UNLV International Gambling Institute and former director of public affairs for MGM Resorts International.

Ray, a slot machine addict, says he wasn't given the opportunity to limit his gambling.

"From an ethical standpoint, I think limiting gambling should be part of the process," says Ted Hartwell of the Nevada Council on Problem Gambling.

Ray, who speaks the language of compulsive gamblers, asserts that his gambling days would have been over if the owner hadn't offered to play for free. According to an email to the Current, neither the complaint he filed with the resort nor his complaint with the Gaming Control Board mentions any wrongdoing.

Most therapists would say, "Yes, the casinos are to blame, but you're also personally responsible, so relying on the casinos to stop you gambling is probably not the best thing to do," White says.

"I am proud to have noticed the first normative acts related to the gambling and serious gambling addiction in Nevada. We have more reliable standards that provide the protection and research of regular customers. "Heartwell," Hartwell, talks about the mission of the Council in Nevada, the state parliamentary department in the state parliament in Nevada. "We want to see the ful l-fledged process of sel f-exclusion, for example, in the field of restoration and healing, as in the field of lawyers.

"As you can assume yourself, the gambling industry will be huge for the conversely" white, "coordination between Nevada's licenses in different parts. Based on that, "From Little Mama, Daddy and Supermarket to Resort Casino". But I believe this is certainly possible.

According to White, Nevada is still important, the concentrated system is cheap for all licenses. "When I have gambling problems at your institution, I mean that there is a problem with gambling and other institutions," he said.

"This is outrageous," said a person who is closely related to the gambling company, saying his name and poor access in Nevada. "If you believe in your sincere attitude toward gambling, this is an effort to entertain your customers. What you are doing is another thing for the buyer, actually for you. Not many things.

"Sufficient standards can lead to unexpected results, and as a result, I will tilt more to solve this problem in the company's political and compassion," says Feldman.

Lobing of the Sel f-Removal Law requires the parliament to make money without Nevada. More than that, he has been struggling to find a special key to raising local governments, as if the payment of $ 2 in 2005 in 2005 in 2005 was delayed.

Problem gambling fund never flush

"At the time we reached the abolition of this ceremony, the actual number of sites on the site has decreased by more than 15 %," Hartwell says. "In other words, the price of life, inflation, and the substantial fall of the dollar were quite a blow."

Council funds decreased from $ 1, 7 million in 2008 to about $ 1 to 3 million in 2017. What is the year of the Advisory Committee on gambling tasks under the governor of Nevada, the minimum funds for one of the 3 million residents in the state and the smallest funds to increase living prices every day? I didn't get the above help.

In 2019, the members posted a quarter of the dollar, but were not helped by the proposal to replace the total gaming tax of 6 %. The gross gaming tax is paid by the resort, but it does not pay a limited number of licenses such as gaming machines such as izakayas, convenience stores, and dotti.

In 2021, the worst time of Pandemic, Congress reduced the grant to the gambling to about 1. 2 million a year, led to a reduction in programs.

Nevada says, "I keep my money here and arrest my problem in my own country."

-Keith White, State Gaming Task Force

According to a report originally created by the New York Times and the US Gambling Service Management State Association, the state funds for the gambling have increased by 28 % between 2016 and 2021, compared to this. It was $ 94 million from the dollar.

In 42 states, which invested in the gambling of the problem, the funding from the state was less than 10 cents in Colorado, which earned $ 1. 4 billion in 2022, to $ 49. 5 million last year. Times reports that there is a wide range of $ 66 per person per person in Oregon.

The National Gambling Administration Council (National Council On Problem Gambling) has recommended that each state invests in gambling addiction measures in proportion to the size of the gambling business.

Last year, Nevada spent $ 40 per population to treat and prevent gambling issues. According to the Nevada Gambling Management Committee, gambling in 2022 reached a record high of $ 14. 8 billion, increasing 10. 5 % from 2021.

"Nevada's leadership in the gaming industry is exposed to pressure from other states." In Moscow, the city of gaming, the Nevada Gaming Council must be the most fundamental organization. " Considering how much profit it is, how much gaming is associated with the economy, and that most of the main gaming organizations have the headquarters here.

"I believe that it is necessary to impose strict procedures by politicians to protect the purchaser's welfare and happiness, which is under the uproar of the advanced gambling industry," says White. In addition, it was added. The situation in Nevada is "very small among politicians projects and is unrelated compared to most advanced gambling regulations."

Experts say the sel f-exclusion program itself is an effective means of approving serious gambling.

Treatment and regulation

"Before self-exclusion, you should consult a psychotherapist. If you suffer from a gaming disorder, you may not be able to consciously decide whether or not to self-exclude and for how long."

White says gambling regulators are "very strict on violations" in states where self-exclusion laws apply. Most self-exclusions are found when a player wins an amount that would require them to provide a character certificate for tax purposes, not when they lose.

"Because of this, most players say, 'Look, I told you I have a problem. I shut her out, but she came back to the casino, sat at the table and lost another $10, 000. You didn't stop me until I won.' It's a great concept, but it should be thought of more as a therapeutic intervention, rather than as a concern about safety or enforcement."

White says that in the United States, where the regulatory system is well developed, players who self-exclude themselves must go through the entire exception period before they are allowed to play.

White says technology is currently being developed that will allow states to share data on self-exclusion.

Caesars Entertainment, a leader in responsible gambling, has implemented an internal self-exclusion registry that is common to all of its sites in the United States, says Jan Jones Blackheart, a member of the company's board of directors.

"We are the only gambling company that has this system integrated into our customer management system. "Customers can choose one year, five years or indefinitely. They can just choose an exception at their local casino and then gamble at the same time when they come to Las Vegas."

According to Jones Blackheart, in states with self-exclusion laws, the winnings of excluded players who violate the system are transferred to charity. But considering that Nevada does not have one, players who violate company policies in the state should be able to keep their winnings.

According to the National Council, the social damage caused by problem gambling is US$7 billion a year, but unlike other addictions and mental disorders, the federal government spends nothing on treating problem gambling.

"One of the problems at the federal level is the shame and stigma surrounding problem gambling, which is why it is specifically excluded from the Americans with Disabilities Act," says White.

Plus, he says gambling is taxed and regulated at the state level, so there's no need for federal involvement.

"But the federal government has two gambling taxes: a jackpot tax and an excise tax on each sports ticket, so federal assistance is justified."

A Nevada law passed in 1991 bans using mental illness as a reason for not paying gambling debts.