What directors can learn from the Crown Resorts inquiry

Directors often refer to the Case Law to substantially understand what their direct responsibilities have in practice. But sometimes, other information providers, as in recent surveys on the conformity of Crown Resorts Limited, which acquire casinos in NUU, freezes the appointment of directors for the recommendation of directors. There is a chance.

Crown's work, which is the same as a report on the business of the Australian Bank of Commonwealth, which was cautiously adjusted in 2018 for the Australian administration, and the irreparable report of the 2019 Tsurist Bank Commission. Patricer Bargin SC Commissioner's report reveals not only the dangers of honesty and reason, as well as the dangers of honesty and reason, whether it had the hidden money or the terrible failure in the management of no n-financial risks. Covers the danger of harm the largest side.

Bargin committee member Bargin is the characteristics of these risks on the next device for hiring the company's conclusions, regarding the crown activities in China and the arrest of employees in October 2016- '. As a subsidiary, like a subsidiary, South Bank and River Bank's bank account, the ability to wash funds in the crown, for example, (brought in a bag or wallet to buy hundreds of thousands of dollars at a casino (for a casino) ); And when the crown warranty is unable to be replaced by the junk, the operator in a good condition is paid only with the junk.

According to the report, the "harsh reality" was the fact that the crown "contributed unlimitedly and unchanged for funding." Without listening to the warnings of his bankers, uncomfortable and unchanged, "" I don't want to wage the employees in China and take the risk of restraint, and take a brutal sales policy. He did without increasing the danger with the appropriate collective risk management system, "he said," I was doing business with Yanken operators connected to triads and other official criminal groups. " < SPAN> Directors often refer to the Case Law to substantially understand what their direct responsibilities have in practice. But sometimes, other information providers, as in recent surveys on the conformity of Crown Resorts Limited, which acquire casinos in NUU, freezes the appointment of directors for the recommendation of directors. There is a chance.

Crown's work, which is the same as a report on the business of the Australian Bank of Commonwealth, which was cautiously adjusted in 2018 for the Australian administration, and the irreparable report of the 2019 Tsurist Bank Commission. Patricer Bargin SC Commissioner's report reveals not only the dangers of honesty and reason, as well as the dangers of honesty and reason, whether it had the hidden money or the terrible failure in the management of no n-financial risks. Covers the danger of harm the largest side.

Bargin committee member Bargin is the characteristics of these risks on the next device for hiring the company's conclusions, regarding the crown activities in China and the arrest of employees in October 2016- '. As a subsidiary, like a subsidiary, South Bank and River Bank's bank account, the ability to wash funds in the crown, for example, (brought in a bag or wallet to buy hundreds of thousands of dollars at a casino (for a casino) ); And when the crown warranty is unable to be replaced by the junk, the operator in a good condition is paid only with the junk.

According to the report, the "harsh reality" was the fact that the crown "contributed unlimitedly and unchanged for funding." Without listening to the warnings of his bankers, uncomfortable and unchanged, "" I don't want to wage the employees in China and take the risk of restraint, and take a brutal sales policy. He did without increasing the danger with the appropriate collective risk management system, "he said," I was doing business with Yanken operators connected to triads and other official criminal groups. " Directors often refer to the Case Law to substantially understand what their direct responsibilities have in practice. But sometimes, other information providers, as in recent surveys on the conformity of Crown Resorts Limited, which acquire casinos in NUU, freezes the appointment of directors for the recommendation of directors. There is a chance.

Board changes

Crown's work, which is the same as a report on the business of the Australian Bank of Commonwealth, which was cautiously adjusted in 2018 for the Australian administration, and the irreparable report of the 2019 Tsurist Bank Commission. Patricer Bargin SC Commissioner's report reveals not only the dangers of honesty and reason, as well as the dangers of honesty and reason, whether it had the hidden money or the terrible failure in the management of no n-financial risks. Covers the danger of harm the largest side.

• According to the report, the "harsh reality" was the fact that the crown "contributed unlimitedly and unchanged for funding." Without listening to the warnings of his bankers, uncomfortable and unchanged, "" I don't want to wage the employees in China and take the risk of restraint, and take a brutal sales policy. He did without increasing the danger with the appropriate collective risk management system, "he said," I was doing business with Yanken operators connected to triads and other official criminal groups. "
• I feel aptitude. Burgin emphasizes "the main significance of reliable branches and top management", and in fact, the personality of the company on the acceptance side can be understood by the behavior, eyes, and values ​​of those who determine the direction. I am. This is a board of directors above the General Manager.
• After Bargin's investigation, the Crown Resorts Board of Directors includes four rea l-time directors covering Helen Kunan.
• Ken Burton (Managing Director and Keemager) -A resigned on February 15th.
• Chairman Helen Kunan
• Andrew Demetoli u-February 11 retired
• Michael Johnsto n-Resigned on February 10
• Sora} Guy Sorlan d-Review on February 10
• Space} JOHN POINTON AO FAIC D-Resigned on March 1st
• Space} Jane Halton AO PSM FAICD

A question of loyalty

{space}

Harold Mitchell A C-R e-draw on February 22

{space}

John Heavat Blu e-Expected to resign

Risk management

{space}

Anthony Corsanos Gaikd

It is believed that the best role in the directors of the director is to actually work for the profit of the company itself. In the Solvent Business Corporation, the company's profits are usually in the direction of shareholders who collectively collect methods in medium- to lon g-term probability and sustainable activities. There is no story about creating what the largest shareholders and large shareholders want. This is more correct in the relationship with a highly regulated company, where what kind of commissable burgin is, "imposing obligations for stakeholders beyond shareholders."

At the same time, for some directors, as shown in the report, the transaction with Mr. James Packer and CPH also unclear this guidance and created a "obviously dysfunction environment." Bargin committee members concluded that the need for the crown did not beat CPH's business needs and desires, and in fact, "actual management, for example, as the power of his own personality, the power of his own personality. It is clear that Packer was embodied, and the obedient activities were occupied by Crown employees to demonstrate a certain level of power. " Crown's work and Packer's "remote control" covers the proposal contract and a promise on dominant shareholders, and the impact will not end until October 2020, and Packer has other shareholders to other shareholders. Secret information that cannot be accessed was provided.

In the group management principle, the need for independence emphasizes the need for independence. This is not only a structural problem. Directors should recognize their commitments to the company itself while agreeing and obeying the major shareholders, and is obliged to conclude based on the company's interests. These benefits may match the interests of the major shareholders, but this is not the case.

The incompetence of several directors, as they worked autonomously in the fact that they took into account the profits and desires of pickers, was clear from the amount and the guarantee of Demetriu Paqueer: "I am still the best in the crown. Fair to the services of profits and are the most important, most important to you. " Not surprising, the commissioner actually reached a conclusion: "It is necessary to complete this external pilot for the welfare of the corporation." < SPAN> It is believed that the best role in the directors of the directors is to work for the company's interests itself. In the Solvent Business Corporation, the company's profits are usually in the direction of shareholders who collectively collect methods in medium- to lon g-term probability and sustainable activities. There is no story about creating what the largest shareholders and large shareholders want. This is more correct in the relationship with a highly regulated company, where what kind of commissable burgin is, "imposing obligations for stakeholders beyond shareholders."

At the same time, for some directors, as shown in the report, the transaction with Mr. James Packer and CPH also unclear this guidance and created a "obviously dysfunction environment." Bargin committee members concluded that the need for the crown did not beat CPH's business needs and desires, and in fact, "actual management, for example, as the power of his own personality, the power of his own personality. It is clear that Packer was embodied, and the obedient activities were occupied by Crown employees to demonstrate a certain level of power. " Crown's work and Packer's "remote control" covers the proposal contract and a promise on dominant shareholders, and the impact will not end until October 2020, and Packer has other shareholders to other shareholders. Secret information that cannot be accessed was provided.